00:13:14  * plutoniixjoined
00:13:30  * plutoniixquit (Max SendQ exceeded)
00:14:13  * plutoniixjoined
00:35:29  * AtumTquit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:43:30  * xaxxonjoined
01:53:25  * bradleymeckjoined
02:51:26  * Guest59joined
03:46:18  * xaxxonquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
04:19:37  * vivekp_joined
04:35:32  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
06:05:42  * xaxxonjoined
07:08:35  * RT|Chatzillaquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
07:31:34  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
10:17:16  * xaxxonquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
11:25:11  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
11:25:42  * mylesborinsjoined
12:25:12  * AtumTjoined
13:07:32  * plutoniixquit (Quit: Leaving)
13:20:00  * vivekp_joined
13:42:26  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
13:59:05  * bradleymeckjoined
15:05:20  * vivekp_joined
16:12:22  <trungl-bot>Tree closed by machenbach@chromium.org: closed - maintenance
16:19:25  <trungl-bot>Tree opened by machenbach@chromium.org: open
16:22:26  <trungl-bot>Tree closed by machenbach@chromium.org: closed - maintenance
16:24:27  <trungl-bot>Tree opened by machenbach@chromium.org: open
16:37:38  * seventhjoined
16:42:34  <trungl-bot>Tree closed by machenbach@chromium.org: closed - maintenance
17:42:01  <trungl-bot>Tree opened by machenbach@chromium.org: Open
17:43:28  <caitp>"but they force me to lose scope"?
17:52:05  <bradleymeck>caitp: that was a long while ago XD
17:52:41  <caitp>znc doesn't forget :x
17:53:28  <caitp>but it does forget to tell me how recently previous conversations occurred
17:59:49  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
18:03:04  * bradleymeckjoined
18:22:51  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
18:25:06  * cloudshujoined
18:31:16  * vivekp_joined
18:57:49  * seventhquit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:44:10  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
19:44:29  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
19:47:24  * vivekp_joined
20:10:51  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
20:33:48  * bradleymeckjoined
20:52:25  <bradleymeck>is "if (x in y) ..." able to be optimized? not sure how to run such a small test... should probably learn somehow
21:12:45  <bradleymeck>--trace-opt-verbose doesn't really say what it did
21:52:57  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: )
22:13:39  * vivekp_joined
22:14:53  * vivekp__joined
22:15:18  * vivekp_quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
22:24:42  * vivekp__quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
22:26:16  * vivekp_joined
22:32:14  <caitp>bradleymeck: the TestIn bytecode is turned into a JSHasProperty op in bytecode-graph-builder, which I'm betting gets simplified or eliminated later on
22:33:09  <caitp>no type feedback for it though
22:33:29  <caitp>so that might reduce the number of cases where it can be simplified
22:37:09  <caitp>i think you were really asking if TestIn bails out optimisation though?
22:38:21  <caitp>which, no, it doesn't
22:44:57  * vivekp_quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
22:50:08  * RT|Chatzillajoined
23:01:27  * Guest59quit (Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
23:01:54  * Guest59joined
23:50:14  * plutoniixjoined
23:51:22  * plutoniixquit (Max SendQ exceeded)
23:52:00  * plutoniixjoined