02:22:52  * stamphoquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
02:23:32  * xaqjoined
02:24:57  * stamphojoined
03:04:35  * bnoordhuisquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
03:05:02  * C-Manquit (Quit: Connection reset by beer)
04:29:39  * Gambit-joined
04:29:43  <Gambit->hoy chaps
04:30:05  <Gambit->I'm playing around with embedding v8 in an existing multithreaded linux pthread application, and running into some glitches
04:30:21  <Gambit->is there some obvious documentation I'm missing on how to set up all the right Isolate contexts and such?
04:49:19  * Gambit-part
05:00:46  * TheJHjoined
05:11:51  * aadsmjoined
05:17:46  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
05:36:05  * btraskjoined
05:43:27  * aadsmquit (Quit: aadsm)
05:49:55  * TheJHquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
06:04:31  * guorquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
07:44:57  * rendarjoined
08:28:30  * joshthecoderquit (Quit: Linkinus - http://linkinus.com)
09:40:08  * guorjoined
09:44:48  * Net147joined
09:45:18  * _olouv_joined
10:18:25  * tmcguirejoined
10:40:17  * Net147quit (Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- Go on, try it!)
10:48:56  * lummoxquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
11:16:12  * C-Manjoined
12:55:34  * Net147joined
13:41:47  * bnoordhuisjoined
13:50:15  * TheJHjoined
13:53:00  * Net147quit (Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- Go on, try it!)
14:10:15  * _olouv_quit (Quit: Linkinus - http://linkinus.com)
14:23:00  * C-Manquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
14:24:53  * SoulRavenjoined
14:25:00  <SoulRaven>hello
14:25:04  <SoulRaven>anybody here?
14:25:49  <SoulRaven>i wondering if javascript will have 64bit operations, because already JavaScript stores all its numbers as 64 bit initally, but as soon as you start using bitwise operators the interpreter converts the number to a 32 bit representation.
14:25:50  <SoulRaven>so way is not posibile to add a Int64 operator and allow opreations bitwise opeations in 64bit
14:55:55  * TheJHquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
15:18:19  <guor>I don't think there are any plans for a int64 typed array
15:18:48  <guor>given that javascript is otherwise untyped, it seems grossly inconsistent to introduce some sort of type here
15:19:00  <guor>not saying that javascript is consistent by itself though
15:20:29  * aadsmjoined
15:31:20  * RT|Chatzillaquit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.22pre/2009081014])
15:32:59  <SoulRaven>but is posibile, right?
16:00:10  * aadsmquit (Quit: aadsm)
16:02:41  <guor>let's say implementing it in v8 would be non-trivial
16:23:34  <SoulRaven>but will be more fast to have opration native, and not to always convert from 64 to 32 and then back in 64
16:24:42  <SoulRaven>and i don't think this "feature" will mess with the js specification, only extend a natural and already implemented feature
16:25:40  <SoulRaven>only the interpreter will be passout when bitwise operation are made
16:39:34  * xaqjoined
16:44:38  * C-Manjoined
16:44:42  * Poxuijjoined
16:57:44  * Poxuijquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
16:57:44  * C-Manquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
17:01:07  * TheJHjoined
17:02:43  * C-Manjoined
17:02:51  * Poxuijjoined
17:07:45  * tmcguirequit (Quit: Bye!)
17:25:05  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:25:55  * joshthecoderjoined
17:46:43  * TheJHquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
17:48:08  * xaqjoined
17:49:35  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
18:00:56  * joshthecoderquit (Quit: Leaving...)
18:25:15  * Poxuijquit
18:30:57  * joshthecoderjoined
19:28:57  * xaqjoined
19:33:37  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:49:21  * xaqjoined
20:03:11  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:06:39  * AndreasMadsenjoined
21:11:43  * SoulRavenquit
21:12:33  * AndreasMadsenquit (Remote host closed the connection)
21:51:19  * xaqjoined
22:01:10  * xaqquit (Remote host closed the connection)
22:11:41  * _olouv_joined
22:26:26  * stamphoquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
22:32:11  * RT|Chatzillajoined
22:33:16  * stamphojoined
22:34:54  * rendarquit