00:19:11  <bterlson>caridy: you almost ready with your ES2018 branch and review materials?
00:19:30  <bterlson>I've got the reflector post ready but https://tc39.github.io/ecma402/2018 404's still
00:23:50  <jschoi>jmdyck: It looks like arrow functions actually support using Contains specifically for new.target, this, and super (https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-arrow-function-definitions-static-semantics-contains).
00:24:05  <jschoi>This strengthens my increasing suspicion that prohibiting `5 |> function () { # + 3 }` but allowing `5 |> () => # + 3` would be a good idea.
00:24:36  <jschoi>You said earlier, “[I’m guessing] don’t mess with Contains,” but do you think TC39 might be more amenable to amending *only* arrow functions’ Contains, to support `#` in addition to new.target, this, and super?
00:25:06  <bterlson>jschoi: I believe that implementation of Contains is merely convenience rather than conveying some deeper principle/meaning
00:25:13  <jschoi>Good to know.
00:26:04  <jschoi>Oh, I guess precedence would be such that it’d have to be `5 |> (() => # + 3)`, whoops.
00:26:27  <bterlson>caridy: ping me when you're ready and I'll make the reflector post
00:51:31  * Jayfluxquit (Quit: Leaving)
01:23:51  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
01:53:16  * jwaldenquit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:57:01  * gibson042joined
02:01:11  * jwaldenjoined
03:51:00  * jmdyckquit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:51:36  * jmdyckjoined
03:56:02  * srl295quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
04:48:24  * jeffmoquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
04:52:20  * jmdyckquit (Remote host closed the connection)
05:18:19  * caridyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
05:19:13  * caridyjoined
05:23:43  * caridyquit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
05:37:11  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
06:22:37  <annevk>bterlson: renaming [[Get]] affects downstream
07:08:19  * jwaldenquit (Quit: back shortly)
07:19:44  * gskachkovjoined
07:27:30  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
07:39:23  * keith_millerjoined
07:58:29  * gibson042quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
08:34:02  * gskachkovquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
09:17:49  * jwaldenjoined
09:37:03  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
10:37:58  <mathiasbynens>rwaldron: ♥ reading about jsvu being helpful will never cease to make my day
10:43:15  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
11:23:38  * jwaldenquit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.92-rdmsoft [XULRunner 35.0.1/20150122214805])
11:25:10  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
11:25:41  * mylesborinsjoined
12:25:37  * AtumTjoined
12:37:09  * jmdyckjoined
13:00:50  * keith_millerjoined
13:27:18  * gskachkovjoined
14:00:01  <jschoi>A tacit shorthand for property access such as `.property` suffers from an ASI hazard, in which if any valid member/callee expression immediately precedes it, even on a different line, they will be chained together. Nevertheless, has TC39 ever actually considered a tacit property-access shorthand?
14:15:47  <rwaldron>mathiasbynens you're probably going to hear a lot more. We're going to use it to build automated test262 runner machines.
14:15:51  <rwaldron>So...
14:15:53  <rwaldron><3
14:20:46  <mathiasbynens>:o :o :o :o
14:21:14  <mathiasbynens>rwaldron: this sounds amazing! can I follow the progress on this somewhere?
15:02:58  * caridyjoined
15:03:05  * caridyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
15:03:24  * caridyjoined
15:30:12  * srl295joined
15:32:59  * AtumT_joined
15:35:59  * AtumTquit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
15:45:45  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
15:46:29  * AtumTjoined
15:47:42  * vikash-afkquit (Remote host closed the connection)
15:47:45  * AtumT_quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
16:14:50  * gskachkovquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
16:23:01  * bradleymeckjoined
16:37:29  <caridy>bterlson: 402 is now up!
16:40:09  <caridy>but I have found an issue with both builds :(
16:55:39  <caridy>bterlson, found the issue, fix is here: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1103
16:55:50  <caridy>402 is working fine now
17:22:28  <bterlson>yt?
17:22:42  <bterlson>mt
17:22:44  <caridy>yes sir! in the 402 meeting, but yes!
17:23:18  <bterlson>caridy: do you see problems with the 2018 rendering? I like the external CSS and JS for the built specs...
17:23:48  * gskachkovjoined
17:24:56  <caridy>I keep seeing the 404 in the console
17:25:00  <caridy>let me try another browser
17:25:19  * vikash-afkjoined
17:25:57  <caridy>yeah, still seeing teh 404, although it works fine (style wise)
17:28:10  <bterlson>ohhhh hmmm
17:30:10  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
17:56:09  * jwaldenjoined
18:03:01  * keith_millerjoined
18:17:37  <jmdyck>bterlson: what's the deadline for 2018 editorials + bugfixes?
18:17:48  <bterlson>jmdyck: like may
18:17:56  <bterlson>early may
18:18:45  <jmdyck>thanks
18:47:08  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
18:47:56  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
18:49:36  * gskachkovjoined
19:14:16  <TabAtkins>jschoi: Do you mean like `vals.map(.foo)` being equivalent to `vals.map(x=>x.foo)`?
19:15:07  <jschoi> TabAtkins: Potentially. I’m focusing on the syntax issues here over any semantics, though.
19:15:35  <TabAtkins>Right, I was just making sure I understood what you were actually talking about. ^_^
19:15:37  <jschoi>And historical consideration/ rejection by TC39 of it, for any purpose.
19:15:42  <jschoi>👍🏻
19:18:04  <jschoi>My idea actually might be to have it refer to a lexical “topic reference” as an extension of a pipe-operator draft I’m writing. But I’m just wondering if such headless property syntax had been categorically considered or verboten by TC39 in the past at all.
19:30:28  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
19:44:09  * Fishrock123joined
19:45:41  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:46:19  * Fishrock123joined
19:46:27  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:52:09  * Fishrock123joined
19:53:13  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:54:24  * Fishrock123joined
19:58:17  * bradleymeckjoined
19:58:57  * Fishrock123quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
20:29:25  * Fishrock123joined
20:29:53  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
20:57:16  * bradleymeckjoined
21:17:29  * keith_millerjoined
21:28:55  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
21:32:10  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
21:51:26  * keith_millerjoined
21:57:21  * Jayfluxjoined
21:57:21  * Jayfluxquit (Changing host)
21:57:21  * Jayfluxjoined
21:58:06  <rwaldron>mathiasbynens lol, when I know, you'll know
21:58:07  <rwaldron>:D
22:00:42  * caridyquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
22:01:18  * caridyjoined
22:03:13  * bradleymeckjoined
22:20:31  <mathiasbynens>fair enough :)
22:27:19  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
22:28:53  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
22:44:23  * keith_millerjoined
23:04:42  * Fishrock123quit (Quit: Leaving...)
23:08:36  * Jayfluxquit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
23:09:11  * Jayfluxjoined
23:09:11  * Jayfluxquit (Changing host)
23:09:11  * Jayfluxjoined
23:31:08  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
23:36:03  * bradleymeckjoined
23:40:57  * keith_millerjoined
23:54:43  * keith_millerquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)