00:07:06  <littledan>Bakkot: What do you think of the option we were discussing above, where subclasses have the private static method "brand" but continue to throw a TypeError on reads or writes to private static fields (with the option to do the complicated semantics of a getter in subclasses)
00:08:27  <Bakkot>ambivalent? I don't like the asymetry between private static methods and private static fields - it's weird that you can use `#foo` in a subclass from `class Base { static #foo(){} }` but not from `class Base { static #foo = function(){} }`
00:09:03  <littledan>should we do this subclass getter thing then?
00:09:14  <Bakkot>I like that option even less
00:09:34  <littledan>you prefer banning private static fields?
00:09:56  <Bakkot>no, I am ambivalent between banning static private fields and allowing them but them throw on subclasses
00:10:04  <Bakkot>and prefer either to the subclass getter thing
00:11:24  <littledan>oh, I see
00:12:06  <littledan>What makes you not like the subclass getter thing?
00:12:59  <Bakkot>It seems like a really complicated mental model, mostly.
00:13:42  <Bakkot>all three of the other field types would allow you to do writes in subclasses, just not `static private`
00:14:43  <littledan>yeah
00:15:34  <littledan>OK, it seems like we have the outline of something that's acceptable (even if not favorite) to the people in this chat: give subclass constructors the superclass private methods, and leave static private fields as previously proposed
01:56:21  * TimothyGujoined
02:42:37  <dilijev>I'm a little confused about the expected behavior of this test (and where this test seems to have been moved to): https://github.com/Microsoft/ChakraCore/issues/4490
02:43:05  <dilijev>re test262 test formerly named 9.2.5_11_g_ii_2
02:43:08  <dilijev>jackhorton: ^
03:57:40  * howdoijoined
04:16:31  * TimothyGupart ("WeeChat 1.6")
04:38:31  * AtumTquit (Remote host closed the connection)
04:38:57  * srl295joined
05:27:59  * jmdyckquit (Remote host closed the connection)
06:48:45  * srl295quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
07:35:02  * bdbackuploljoined
07:35:29  * bdbackuplolpart
11:19:13  * AtumTjoined
11:25:10  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
11:25:41  * mylesborinsjoined
11:29:00  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
12:35:55  * jmdyckjoined
14:01:05  * gibson042joined
15:01:23  * IgnoredA1biencechanged nick to IgnoredAmbience
15:39:57  * srl295joined
16:43:38  * jwaldenjoined
17:05:11  * jwaldenquit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:05:43  * jwaldenjoined
17:18:53  <jackhorton>It looks like it got moved to ./test/intl402/Collator/missing-unicode-ext-value-defaults-to-true.js
18:31:44  * jwaldenquit (Quit: descending low enough, back online from the ground)
19:13:48  * AtumT_joined
19:16:55  * AtumTquit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
19:26:00  * jwaldenjoined
19:27:10  * AtumTjoined
19:28:33  * AtumT_quit (Ping timeout: 263 seconds)
19:43:45  * bradleymeckjoined
19:47:52  * darkSeid_joined
19:50:20  * jwaldenquit (Quit: too close for complimentary wifi, switching to tethering)
19:59:44  * jwaldenjoined
20:16:34  * darkSeid_quit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
20:18:47  * darkSeid_joined
20:22:31  * jwaldenquit (Quit: lining up for the flight, see you from the air)
20:29:11  <dilijev>ah that tests is about resolved options more than the output of Intl.getCanonicalLocales / CanonicalizeLocaleList
20:38:29  <jackhorton>but we fail it until we correctly implement CanonicalizeLanguageTag
20:50:12  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
21:18:07  * jwaldenjoined
21:18:34  * jwalden_joined
21:19:08  * jwaldenquit (Remote host closed the connection)
21:19:09  * jwalden_changed nick to jwalden
21:53:43  * boazjoined
23:36:37  * floatleftquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
23:58:43  * darkSeid_quit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)