00:10:04  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
00:10:57  <jwalden>I guess I can make a PR there, but pretty much the entirety of the test is going to be ECMA-262 functionality being used/tested, and I wouldn't be surprised if w-p-t people say it belongs in test262
00:12:49  * Fishrock123joined
00:13:55  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
00:30:45  <jmdyck>bterlson or Domenic?
00:31:42  * jwaldenqueries in #whatwg to see if w-p-t really would take those tests
00:37:22  * bradleymeckjoined
00:37:50  * bathosjoined
00:39:15  * bathosquit (Client Quit)
01:00:06  * kiswejoined
01:00:07  * kiswepart
01:01:18  * AtumTquit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:09:36  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:10:41  * Fishrock123joined
01:11:01  * bathosjoined
01:16:39  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:19:16  * Fishrock123joined
01:26:25  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:55:32  * jmdyckquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
01:57:37  * Fishrock123joined
01:58:11  * jmdyckjoined
02:02:16  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:21:40  * Fishrock123joined
02:33:07  * Fishrock123quit (Quit: Leaving...)
02:41:36  * FireFlyquit (Quit: Goodbye)
02:42:50  * FireFlyjoined
02:51:47  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
03:27:45  * howdoijoined
03:32:47  * caridyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:33:20  * caridyjoined
04:08:41  * jmdyckquit (Remote host closed the connection)
04:50:14  * jwaldenquit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.92-rdmsoft [XULRunner 35.0.1/20150122214805])
05:57:03  * howdoiquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
06:44:50  * gibson042quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
07:06:52  * bathosquit (Quit: bathos)
09:09:42  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
09:30:18  * AtumTjoined
10:25:12  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
10:25:42  * mylesborinsjoined
12:46:55  * jmdyckjoined
13:45:12  * bathosjoined
14:12:34  * bradleymeckjoined
15:08:23  * caridyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
15:09:01  * caridyjoined
15:46:50  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
16:00:32  * jwaldenjoined
16:21:16  * bradleymeckjoined
16:41:40  * bathosquit (Quit: bathos)
16:42:39  * bathosjoined
16:56:07  * AtumT_joined
16:58:48  * AtumTquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
17:09:56  * AtumTjoined
17:10:27  * AtumT_quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
17:22:25  <bterlson>jmdyck: pong
17:22:32  <bterlson>oh
17:22:46  <bterlson>re: ULEO (ULEO for life)
17:23:17  <cloudshu>whoop whoop
17:23:23  <jmdyck>nm, was just to ask about what ended up at issue 1022
17:23:24  <cloudshu>(what does that stand for again)
17:23:33  <bterlson>undefined-like exotic object
17:23:34  <jmdyck>s/at/as/
17:23:56  * jwaldenconsults logs for what sounds like a conversation Relevant To His Interests
17:24:06  <bterlson>jmdyck: ahh ok
17:24:36  <bterlson>jwalden: fwiw I supported ULEO tests in WPT because ULEO only exists in the web platform, but I am ok also testing in test262 if it makes sense for impls
17:24:52  <jwalden>that sounds nice
17:25:02  <jwalden>guess I'll do the annexB/IsHTMLDDA moving now
19:24:31  <jwalden>leobalter: updated the PR with the file-move
19:26:14  <leobalter>jwalden thanks.
19:27:06  <leobalter>bterlson same wrt having ULEO tests in WPT. This specific case touches a spec level field handling an object recognized by ECMAScript
19:27:41  <leobalter>iteration close operations (from yield * or IteratorClose) handling a IsHTMLDDA.
19:28:15  <leobalter>plus: if they are in a separate folder, it should be easy to filter them out if they are not necessary
20:14:45  <ljharb>it's effectively impossible to test a ULEO outside of a browser that has `document` tho, right?
20:18:37  <jwalden>ljharb: SpiderMonkey's shell has an objectEmulatingUndefined() function that returns such an object; v8 has a native that returns the same
20:19:07  <jwalden>v8 people could maybe expose that native's functionality somehow in their shell somehow, to help with testing the extra functionality
20:19:22  <jwalden>I'm a bit surprised they haven't already
20:20:26  <ljharb>interesting, ok
20:20:35  <ljharb>is there a flag that exposes that in node?
20:21:46  <jwalden>--expose-native-syntax (sp?) lets you type out the %thing() usably
20:22:04  <jwalden>seems like you wouldn't want to run tests with it on, tho
20:26:54  <Bakkot>I don't think there's anything in test262 which would conflict with the syntax, so it would actually probably work.
20:27:04  <Bakkot>ljharb: --allow-natives-syntax exposes it in node, yes
20:27:55  * bterlsonadds a test to test262 ensuring %foo() always throws a syntax error
20:31:17  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
20:31:43  <bradleymeck>I know some addons create them
20:31:55  <bradleymeck>but always to mock document.all
20:34:48  <jwalden>bterlson++
20:35:22  <jwalden>document.all certainly deserves mocking
20:56:26  <ljharb>Bakkot: ah ok, neat
21:05:20  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
22:41:42  * bradleymeckjoined
23:52:44  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)