02:42:22  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:42:58  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:44:38  * chico____joined
02:45:15  * chico____quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:45:32  * chico____joined
02:46:01  * chico____quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:46:10  * chico____joined
02:46:20  * chicoxyz_quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
02:46:47  * chico____quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:46:57  * chicoxyz_joined
02:47:33  * chicoxyz_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:47:42  * chicoxyz_joined
02:48:19  * chicoxyz_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:48:32  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:49:05  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:49:22  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:49:51  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:50:07  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:50:38  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:50:53  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:51:24  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:51:37  * chicoxyzzyjoined
02:52:10  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:08:08  * gskachkovquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
03:13:59  * jmdyckquit (Quit: Leaving.)
03:26:00  * chicoxyzzyjoined
04:02:35  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
04:04:56  * chicoxyzzyjoined
04:26:53  * chicoxyzzyquit
06:13:40  * gskachkovjoined
10:25:10  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
10:25:40  * mylesborinsjoined
10:48:18  * jmdyckjoined
11:41:11  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
12:05:16  * chicoxyzzyjoined
12:07:12  * chicoxyz_joined
12:11:12  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
12:18:00  * chicoxyz_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
12:24:08  * gskachkovquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
12:24:10  * gskachkov_joined
12:55:43  * leobalte2quit (Quit: Changing server)
12:59:16  * bradleymeckjoined
13:11:18  * caiolima__changed nick to caiolima
13:48:13  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
14:04:47  * chicoxyzzyjoined
14:12:27  * bradleymeckjoined
14:33:09  * Fishrock123joined
14:38:30  * gskachkov_quit (Quit: gskachkov_)
14:57:57  * gibson042joined
15:56:18  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
16:05:36  * chicoxyz_joined
16:06:56  * chicoxy__joined
16:08:09  * chicox___joined
16:08:37  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
16:09:59  * chicoxyz_quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
16:11:03  * chicoxy__quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
16:13:59  * bradleymeckjoined
16:18:11  * chicox___quit (Remote host closed the connection)
16:51:27  * caridy_joined
16:54:58  * caridyquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
16:59:44  * chicoxyzzyjoined
17:04:18  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:07:29  * chicoxyzzyjoined
17:41:18  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:47:06  * chicoxyzzyjoined
17:47:36  * chicoxyz_joined
17:51:27  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
17:52:15  * caridy_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:52:49  * caridyjoined
18:01:46  <littledan>bterlson: Is there a way to sign the test262 CLA as an organization, rather than an individual?
18:14:11  * ephemera__joined
18:18:24  * thealphanerdjoined
18:19:39  * mylesborinsquit (*.net *.split)
18:19:40  * M-IvanSanchezquit (*.net *.split)
18:19:40  * ephemera_quit (*.net *.split)
18:19:44  * thealphanerdchanged nick to MylesBorins
18:26:03  * M-IvanSanchezjoined
18:27:02  <Domenic>bterlson: any thoughts on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/933 yet?
18:51:33  <bterlson>evilpie: welcome :-P
18:51:50  <bterlson>littledan: no, I don't think so (everyone at MSFT has to sign individually according to our docs anyway)
18:52:15  <bterlson>littledan: could work with ECMA to allow per-company singing though probably? Not sure of the legalities ofc
18:53:28  <jmdyck>get the company choir to sing the CLA
18:53:34  <bterlson>Domenic: unfortunately I'm not doing much work this week on account of traveling in Germany but re: promise-prototype-finally/#29 I would be sad to verbosify it because I feel like we can easily get consensus on some subset of your ideas in 933
18:54:15  <bterlson>jmdyck: which one? I see multiple advertised in the hallways :-P
18:54:54  <Domenic>bterlson: ah good feedback ok
18:55:26  <Domenic>Well I marked that as editorial i.e. not stage 3 blocking but yeah I'd like us to figure out something soon
18:55:37  <Domenic>Maybe just closures for now and promise-specific stuff later
18:55:55  <Domenic>Also I was thinking closures could have a margin color or something to help warn people
19:01:41  <aklein>Domenic: (from the peanut gallery, since I don't write much spec text) isn't the promise-specific stuff the bigger win there?
19:02:48  <Domenic>I guess that stuff generally cleans up the 3-5 lines of boilerplate before doing the closure stuff
19:03:05  <Domenic>It makes the intent a lot clearer to be sure
19:04:23  <aklein>I think I possibly haven't swapped enough of this into my head...when I read through some of your examples. it seemed like you needed to create new closures just so you could pass them to other spec-internal machinery
19:05:14  <aklein>like PerformPromiseThen. my reading was that 'upon-fulfillment' was meant to stand in for that language
19:05:20  <aklein>lunchtime, bbiab
19:17:16  * gskachkovjoined
19:18:32  <Domenic>Yeah that's true
19:18:43  <Domenic>I'm not sure we'd write "Upon fulfillment" as doing anything different though
19:18:55  <Domenic>It'd probably just create an unobservable closure (maybe with a note that it's unobservable)
19:19:14  <Domenic>Otherwise we'd have to do a lot of plumbing through to create a new type of PromiseReactionJob etc.
19:25:02  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: )
19:28:57  * bradleymeckjoined
19:28:58  * bradleymeckquit (Client Quit)
19:32:38  * basicdaysquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
19:40:00  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
19:40:58  * gskachkovjoined
19:41:08  * basicdaysjoined
19:44:43  * bradleymeckjoined
19:48:25  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
19:48:56  * gskachkovjoined
20:10:05  <cloudshu>bterlson: you must be swamped, but any thoughts on #930?
20:44:59  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:47:05  * Fishrock123joined
20:59:14  <aklein>Domenic: noting the unobservability does seem advantageous to me
21:21:41  * jeffmo_quit (*.net *.split)
21:21:41  * mathiasbynensquit (*.net *.split)
21:21:41  * annevkquit (*.net *.split)
21:21:41  * caitpquit (*.net *.split)
21:21:56  * caitpjoined
21:22:05  * annevkjoined
21:22:21  * jeffmo_joined
21:22:25  * mathiasbynensjoined
21:22:35  * jeffmo_changed nick to jeffmo
21:22:49  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
21:24:54  <littledan>bterlson: individual CLA is probably fine; I was just remembering wrong
21:30:37  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
21:31:16  * bradleymeckjoined
21:34:46  * gskachkovjoined
21:50:05  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
21:50:55  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
21:51:41  * gskachkovjoined
21:56:25  * Fishrock123joined
23:05:05  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
23:12:31  * Fishrock123joined
23:35:57  * chicoxyz_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
23:36:19  * chicoxyzzyjoined