00:06:13  * rbucktonjoined
00:10:17  * rbucktonquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
01:35:50  * rbucktonjoined
02:00:21  * Bakkotquit (Quit: death)
02:01:15  * rbucktonquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
02:22:36  * rbucktonjoined
02:31:13  * Bakkotjoined
02:33:56  * Bakkotquit (Client Quit)
03:05:25  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
04:05:37  * chicoxyzzyjoined
04:18:35  * jmdyckquit (Quit: Leaving.)
04:21:56  * gibson042quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
04:32:13  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
05:01:12  * chicoxyzzyjoined
05:05:15  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
05:05:16  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
05:06:24  * Bakkotjoined
06:30:31  * gskachkovjoined
09:27:27  * leobalterquit (*.net *.split)
09:27:29  * rbucktonquit (*.net *.split)
09:27:30  * STRMLquit (*.net *.split)
10:13:32  * rbucktonjoined
10:13:32  * STRMLjoined
10:16:25  * mylesborinsquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
10:18:57  * mylesborinsjoined
10:19:24  * chicoxyzzyquit (Remote host closed the connection)
10:25:11  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
10:25:42  * mylesborinsjoined
10:52:36  * chicoxyzzyjoined
10:57:08  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
11:06:41  * chicoxyzzyjoined
11:10:21  * chicoxyz_joined
11:11:48  * chicoxyz_quit (Client Quit)
11:12:27  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
11:14:10  * chicoxyzzyjoined
11:18:26  * chicoxyzzyquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
12:17:19  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
12:24:00  * jmdyckjoined
12:29:17  * gskachkovjoined
12:33:25  * gskachkovquit (Client Quit)
12:35:20  * gskachkovjoined
13:13:27  * sebmckjoined
14:34:08  * rbucktonquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
14:44:56  * sebmckquit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
14:47:11  * sebmckjoined
15:19:33  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
16:59:13  * bradleymeckjoined
17:41:25  <bterlson>we have items that are both "awaiting merge" and "needs tests"
17:41:35  <bterlson>guess I'm writing tests :-P
17:46:57  * gskachkovjoined
18:01:44  * caridyjoined
18:07:38  * caridyquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
18:21:26  * caridyjoined
18:26:37  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
18:31:08  * gskachkovjoined
18:33:32  * gskachkovquit (Client Quit)
18:45:30  * Fishrock123joined
18:49:56  * Fishrock123quit (Client Quit)
19:01:58  * gskachkovjoined
19:04:50  * gskachkovquit (Client Quit)
19:06:51  * gskachkovjoined
19:46:35  <bterlson>ljharb: improvement? https://github.com/bterlson/ecma262/commit/a1fa262bd7e573e1c6105452189746dd3ce772c7 :-P
19:49:44  <ljharb>bterlson: it's more consistent, yes :-) thanks
19:50:20  <bterlson>ljharb: look closely at line 27394
19:50:52  <bterlson>"a string of the form" is kinda wonky anyway but worried about making it even more confusing
19:58:11  <ljharb>bterlson: maybe something like "let tzname be an implementation-defined string, either the empty string, or a string containing the code unit 0x0020 (SPACE), an open parenthesis, an implementation-defined timezone name, and a close parenthesis"?
19:58:20  <ljharb>probably some better way to do ( and ), ofc
19:58:33  <bterlson>ljharb: you are right, much better
19:58:40  <bterlson>ljharb: will do that now
19:59:01  <ljharb>word
20:05:37  <bterlson>maximum pedantry mode engage:
20:05:38  <bterlson>Let _tzName_ be an implementation-defined string that is either the empty string or the String value formed by concatenating the code unit 0x0020 (SPACE), the code unit 0x0028 (LEFT PARENTHESIS), an implementation-dependent timezone name, and the code unit 0x0029 (RIGHT PARENTHESIS).
20:06:52  <ljharb>pedantry confirmed, i concur
20:17:22  <Bakkot>s/(an implementation-dependent timezone name)/a string containing \1/
20:17:46  <Bakkot>I guess "name" kind of implies "string" to most people. though not JS people because symbols.
20:51:31  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
20:51:51  * gskachkovjoined
21:04:37  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
21:05:49  * gskachkovjoined
21:07:19  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
21:09:14  * gskachkovquit (Client Quit)
21:20:21  * gskachkovjoined
21:25:38  * gskachkovquit (Quit: gskachkov)
21:53:23  <jmdyck>Bakkot: the problem with "a string containing foo" is that it could be read as allowing the string to contain things in addition to foo. In this context, I don't think "a string containing" is necessary.
22:06:55  * sebmckquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
23:13:38  <bterlson>it's funny I spent many seconds pondering this
23:14:03  <bterlson>I had "a string consisting of"
23:14:15  <bterlson>but decided it wasn't necessary
23:14:31  <bterlson>but I was also a little upset about all the added verbosity already; I'd take a PR for it ;)