00:05:12  * Fishrock123joined
00:09:35  * Fishrock123quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
00:20:23  * Fishrock123joined
00:25:40  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
00:26:21  * Fishrock123joined
00:26:28  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
00:53:04  <ljharb>aklein: is there any implementor reason to prefer one over the other besides "it's already there"?
00:53:11  <ljharb>aklein: both for user and builtin anon funcs
00:58:54  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
01:11:18  * Fishrock123joined
01:12:02  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:54:35  * rwaldron_joined
02:00:18  * rwaldron_quit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
02:29:13  * jmdyck1joined
02:29:32  * jmdyckquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
04:07:37  * jmdyck1quit (Quit: Leaving.)
04:19:00  * caridy_joined
04:19:00  * caridyquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
04:25:16  * caridyjoined
04:27:36  * caridy_quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
04:34:52  * caridyquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
04:35:03  * caridyjoined
04:37:21  * caridyquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
04:37:31  * caridyjoined
05:55:03  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
07:14:10  * caridyquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
07:14:57  * caridyjoined
08:37:33  <cloudshu>ljharb: possible webcompat concerns if 3 engines agree
08:38:16  <ljharb>cloudshu: possible; but usually web compat means all agree
08:38:49  <cloudshu>ljharb: right, i think if all disagreed with spec it'd be clearer which direction we should go
08:38:53  <ljharb>right
08:38:58  <cloudshu>ljharb: but now we'd need to at least check
08:39:06  <cloudshu>ljharb: that's how i interpret "not clear which direction we should go"
08:39:10  <ljharb>i guess the real question is, which semantics are ideologically better? and then, are there implementor reasons not to implement those?
08:39:27  <cloudshu>ljharb: oh, from that pov i have no idea and no opinions
08:39:29  <ljharb>if we all decide that what's in the spec isn't what we really want, then we shouldn't bother implementing it
08:40:11  <cloudshu>ljharb: ideologically i'd agree with spec as is right now i think
08:40:25  <ljharb>i think i do too
08:48:55  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
10:25:09  * mylesborinsquit (Quit: farewell for now)
10:25:40  * mylesborinsjoined
11:09:09  * jmdyckjoined
11:22:28  * M-IvanSanchezquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
11:29:09  * M-IvanSanchezjoined
13:45:06  * rwaldron_joined
14:12:46  * rwaldron_quit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)
14:13:09  * rwaldron_joined
14:16:53  * rwaldron_quit (Client Quit)
14:35:28  * Fishrock123joined
14:39:43  <leobalter>cloudshu ljharb: I'll write a few specific tests. There's already a bug report on v8 for this. I can bring it for review in the next meeting.
15:19:02  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
15:45:49  * caridy_joined
15:49:10  * caridyquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
16:38:27  * rwaldronjoined
17:02:54  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:08:54  * Fishrock123joined
17:19:03  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:19:42  * Fishrock123joined
17:19:48  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
17:58:21  * Fishrock123joined
18:00:13  * Fishrock123quit (Client Quit)
18:56:13  * gskachkov_joined
19:07:34  * gskachkov_quit (Quit: gskachkov_)
19:08:54  * not-an-aardvarkquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
19:09:53  * gskachkov_joined
19:15:13  * gskachkov_quit (Quit: gskachkov_)
19:29:52  * gskachkov_joined
20:28:17  * not-an-aardvarkjoined
20:52:48  * Fishrock123joined
21:04:27  * gskachkov_quit (Quit: gskachkov_)
22:23:05  * gskachkov_joined
22:24:20  * gskachkov_quit (Client Quit)
23:08:48  * Fishrock123quit (Quit: Leaving...)