00:46:37  * kkantorjoined
01:02:38  * elijahZ24quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
01:10:55  * elijahZ24joined
01:20:01  * ed209quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:20:08  * ed209joined
01:24:40  * jhendricksjoined
01:38:41  * bahamat_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
01:41:10  * bahamatjoined
01:48:39  * kkantorquit (Quit: kkantor)
01:53:21  * jayschmidtquit (Quit: Leaving.)
02:07:41  * jhendricksquit (Quit: Leaving.)
02:14:22  * bahamatquit (Quit: Leaving.)
02:17:56  * noresultquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
02:18:13  * noresultjoined
03:06:43  * bahamatjoined
04:11:17  * elijahZ24quit (Quit: Leaving.)
04:11:19  * elijahZ241joined
04:17:04  * Technoquit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
04:20:34  * bahamatquit (Quit: Leaving.)
04:22:26  * jhendricksjoined
04:24:12  * Technojoined
05:02:07  * jhendricks1joined
05:02:07  * jhendricksquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
05:55:39  * jhendricks1quit (Quit: Leaving.)
06:29:14  * elijahZ241quit (Quit: Leaving.)
06:29:16  * elijahZ24joined
06:37:59  * elijahZ24quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
06:38:02  * elijahZ241joined
10:20:01  * ed209quit (Remote host closed the connection)
10:20:08  * ed209joined
11:31:44  * jayschmidtjoined
13:14:54  * chorrelljoined
13:15:27  * chorrellquit (Client Quit)
13:18:09  * chorrelljoined
13:38:14  * elijahZ241quit (Quit: Leaving.)
13:38:18  * elijahZ24joined
13:58:03  * jinniquit (Remote host closed the connection)
13:58:11  * jinnijoined
14:12:33  * chorrellquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
14:23:10  * chorrelljoined
14:24:10  * jhendricksjoined
14:24:51  * jhendricksquit (Client Quit)
14:41:24  * chorrellquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
14:54:16  * chorrelljoined
15:41:41  * chorrellquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
15:56:40  * chorrelljoined
16:23:36  * bahamatjoined
16:28:08  * wizard113joined
16:30:46  <wizard113>good morning - is running a job over a bunch of manta objects that reads some data, transforms that data, and writes it back to the source object a dumb idea, i.e. is it better to just write new objects?
16:31:11  <bahamat>wizard113: In general I write to new objects.
16:31:23  <bahamat>There's no reason you *can't* write to the same objects.
16:31:46  <bahamat>But your job isn't repeatable if the inputs are modified.
16:32:12  <Smithx10>sounds like a bad idea
16:32:37  <bahamat>It depends on your requirements.
16:32:51  <Smithx10>tru3
16:33:17  <wizard113>bahamat: I have a snaplink to the source, so with a bit of work it is possible to "reset" and make it repeatable.
16:33:27  <wizard113>at least, I think it is
16:34:03  <bahamat>A symlink? You mean snaplink?
16:34:20  <wizard113>snaplink, yes
16:35:11  <bahamat>That works to.
16:35:13  <bahamat>too, even.
16:35:57  <bahamat>But on a technical level, there's no reason you can't write out to the same location as the input object(s).
16:39:13  * wizard113quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
16:45:07  * chorrellquit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)
16:51:50  * wizard113joined
17:04:02  * wizard113quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
17:36:05  * happy-dudejoined
18:04:10  * jhendricksjoined
20:10:26  * pmooneyquit (Quit: WeeChat 1.7.1)
20:20:01  * ed209quit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:20:08  * ed209joined