00:00:09  * ircretaryjoined
00:02:56  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
00:09:03  * a_lequit (Remote host closed the connection)
00:09:30  * a_lejoined
00:10:08  * a_lequit (Remote host closed the connection)
00:10:59  * a_lejoined
00:15:25  * a_lequit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
00:27:03  <jgi>chrisdickinson: were you able to reproduce this issue: https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/8488?
00:27:53  * a_lejoined
00:37:57  * piscisaureusquit (Quit: ~ Trillian Astra - www.trillian.im ~)
00:42:12  * c4milojoined
00:42:46  <jgi>trevnorris: is it a good time to start reviewing https://github.com/joyent/node/pull/8110?
00:43:30  <trevnorris>jgi: sure. go ahead. the last commit is labeled as WIP because I wanted feedback, but from the meeting sounds like it's the only way to make it do what I want.
00:44:24  <trevnorris>so that commit will be squashed into that previous
00:45:03  <jgi>trevnorris: have we run tests for this branch on jenkins?
00:45:24  <trevnorris>jgi: no idea.
00:45:41  <jgi>alright, then I’ll do that before reviewing
00:45:49  <trevnorris>thanks :)
00:46:58  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
00:47:39  * rendarquit (Quit: Leaving)
00:49:11  * nickleeflyjoined
00:50:56  <jgi>trevnorris: tests running, I’ll let you know how it goes
00:54:45  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
01:05:12  <jgi>trevnorris: it seems we get a few errors such as this one: http://jenkins.nodejs.org/job/nodejs-julien/DESTCPU=ia32,label=ubuntu-12.04/lastBuild/tapTestReport/gc.tap-1/
01:05:32  <jgi>trevnorris: see http://jenkins.nodejs.org/job/nodejs-julien/ for more tests results on other platforms
01:06:11  <trevnorris>jgi: hm. that's an issue w/ a commit I landed recently. not w/ my patch.
01:06:11  <jgi>trevnorris: SmartOS doesn’t build because it misses two fixes. https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1593 and https://github.com/joyent/node/pull/8816
01:07:18  <trevnorris>jgi: no one is working on joyent/libuv anymore. everything is being done in libuv/libuv. if joyent has an issue w/ that then they better dedicate some resources to it.
01:09:46  <trevnorris>jgi: want me to merge 8816?
01:11:53  <trevnorris>ah shit. I told thorsten to use the wrong check.
01:11:59  <trevnorris>(for c131c1f) i'll fix that.
01:13:05  <jgi>trevnorris: I’d like tjfontaine to approve 8816 before landing it, since he’s the one who did a lot of work on dtrace probes recently if I understand correctly
01:13:10  <Ralith>trevnorris: wait, that move wasn't made with joyent's knowledge and cooperation?
01:14:11  <trevnorris>Ralith: there was an issue posted in libuv, and since it wasn't technically moved, but the programmers that are doing all the work decided they would be landing all there commits in libuv/libuv, there wasn't much need for that.
01:15:03  <trevnorris>and since it's been happening for a while now, and joyent didn't even notice, it's obvious they don't devote any resources to it.
01:15:52  <Ralith>interesting
01:16:40  <octetcloud>anyone else noticed that 0.11.14 wasn't merged back to master after release? git describe on head of v0.12 says its derived from 0.11.13... the last 0.11 release tag that was merged
01:17:17  * Ralithdoublechecks that his PRs from way back when made it in
01:17:58  <Ralith>I had the impression that joyent was actively maintaining and funding work on libuv as a fundemental component of node
01:18:34  <trevnorris>maybe they did, but not recently.
01:19:14  <octetcloud>Ralish: its a general impression. git log libuv/libuv and make your own impression
01:19:26  <Ralith>is there an organization formally responsible for maintenance at present?
01:19:39  <MI6>joyent/node: Trevor Norris v0.12 * e67db01 : node: fix bad assert - http://git.io/OzW3jQ
01:19:46  <trevnorris>jgi: ^
01:19:52  <trevnorris>i'll rebase my work
01:20:29  <octetcloud>jgi: is that Julien Gilli?
01:20:44  <jgi>trevnorris: thanks, let me know when I can start the tests again
01:20:55  <jgi>octetcloud: yes it is :)
01:20:57  <trevnorris>jgi: done and ready
01:21:03  <jgi>trevnorris: thanks!
01:21:08  <trevnorris>thank you :)
01:21:41  <octetcloud>well, hi!
01:22:11  * abraxas_joined
01:22:20  <jgi>octetcloud: hi!
01:22:29  <octetcloud>I got some time, and I'm cleaning up my open PRs. Just FYI, since I promised.
01:23:09  <octetcloud>jgi: uh, I'm Sam Roberts/vieuxtech, to connect up all my handles
01:24:00  <jgi>octetcloud: yep, I know, I got confused a few times but I think now my brain is wired to associate all these different handles together :)
01:26:58  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
01:29:16  <jgi>trevnorris: also, not sure if it’s fixed by your most recent changes, but we get on test failing on Windows: http://jenkins.nodejs.org/job/nodejs-julien-windows/DESTCPU=ia32,label=windows/lastBuild/tapTestReport/simple.tap-631/
01:30:22  <trevnorris>jgi: that's on v0.12, or my changes?
01:30:35  * kazuponjoined
01:30:36  <jgi>trevnorris: your remove-al-js branch
01:30:39  <trevnorris>that shouldn't be possible, honestly.
01:31:28  <trevnorris>damn. i'll fire up my windows box. but that seriously shouldn't be possible.
01:32:20  <trevnorris>jgi: ah, it's a test that uses the internals. okay. the test needs fixing.
01:34:53  <trevnorris>jgi: if that test doesn't fail on linux, then it's a crap test.
01:36:39  <trevnorris>that assertion should always fail.
01:37:19  <trevnorris>jgi: it must be a race condition between the class being destructed and the test existing.
01:38:11  <trevnorris>jgi: test is fixed, and pushed up.
01:38:16  <jgi>trevnorris: thanks
01:38:27  <trevnorris>wait. it's thinking about it. github is being slow.
01:39:07  <trevnorris>jgi: okay. now done
01:40:40  <jgi>trevnorris: tests started, should be done in around 10 minutes
01:45:48  * qard_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
01:58:16  <tjfontaine>jgi, trevnorris what's up?
01:58:50  <trevnorris>tjfontaine: since hangouts kicked me out, wanted to know the decision of v8
02:00:43  <tjfontaine>trevnorris: well, we didn't really get a decision, because we're not all agreed right now -- jgi, myself, and AlexisMocha had expressed concerns -- mine are mostly about not wanting to delay 0.12 further, and alexis raised concerns that point out that this not only means that node's build system depends on c++11 upgrades, but that means also downline people compling modules will have to be able to support that as well
02:01:24  <trevnorris>okay. cool.
02:06:26  * abraxas_joined
02:07:04  * a_lequit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:07:40  * a_lejoined
02:09:48  * Ralithquit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
02:10:39  <jgi>cjihrig: ping?
02:11:58  * a_lequit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
02:11:59  * bradleymeckjoined
02:16:05  <jgi>cjihrig: neverming, I found what I was looking for :)
02:16:34  * wolfeidaujoined
02:20:44  * kriskowalquit (Quit: kriskowal)
02:24:34  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
02:31:06  * c4milojoined
02:31:21  <cjihrig>jgi: delayed pong. did you get a chance to look at that timeout PR comment?
02:31:37  <jgi>cjihrig: yes, I’m replying right now :)
02:31:49  <cjihrig>cool :-)
02:34:00  <jgi>trevnorris: https://github.com/joyent/node/pull/8110#issuecomment-65528832
02:36:23  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
02:37:01  * Ralithjoined
02:38:57  * chris_99joined
02:48:22  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
02:55:36  * andrehjrjoined
02:57:10  * avalanche123joined
02:58:48  * inolenjoined
02:58:56  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:00:06  * andrehjrquit (Client Quit)
03:04:29  * Fishrock123quit (Quit: Leaving...)
03:05:14  * andrehjrjoined
03:06:13  <jgi>cjihrig: https://github.com/joyent/node/pull/8739#issuecomment-65531188
03:06:17  <jgi>cjihrig: sorry it took so long
03:07:01  <jgi>cjihrig: I don’t want to stop anyone from making progress though, I just want to make sure that we explore the opportunity of making this API more robust
03:07:35  <jgi>cjihrig: I would be fine with doing that in an unstable branch
03:08:06  <cjihrig>jgi: no problem. reading...
03:10:45  * AvianFlujoined
03:11:18  <cjihrig>jgi: i think i fall somewhere in the middle of you and trevnorris. i would like to throw if a non-number is passed in, but coerce to zero if it is negative, Infinity, NaN, etc.
03:12:03  <cjihrig>jgi: and update the documentation, which the PR does not currently do :-)
03:17:22  <jgi>cjihrig: ok, I have to sign off, let’s wait until tomorrow to gather a bit more input on that and we should be able to make a decision soon.
03:17:36  <cjihrig>jgi: sounds good
03:24:04  * a_lejoined
03:24:06  <jgi>good night everyone, see you tomorrow :)
03:24:11  * jgiquit (Quit: jgi)
03:25:51  * warehouse13quit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:26:33  * reqsharkjoined
03:27:11  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
03:45:34  * AlexisMochaquit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
03:50:45  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
03:54:39  * c4milojoined
03:57:33  * chris_99quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
03:59:12  <trevnorris>cjihrig: i updated my opinion on #8739
03:59:19  * avalanche123joined
04:00:28  <cjihrig>trevnorris: ok. thanks
04:01:20  <cjihrig>trevnorris: i noticed you updated to throw a type error for uint32
04:02:15  <trevnorris>cjihrig: we could do 2 checks, and also throw a RangeError if msecs is int < 0, but I considered it cluter.
04:02:30  <trevnorris>*clutter
04:03:39  <cjihrig>trevnorris: i just wanted to double check since it's not strictly a javascript type. bumped into something similar a little while back here - https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/8717#issuecomment-62897638
04:03:49  * avalanche123quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
04:04:47  * c4miloquit (Remote host closed the connection)
04:08:59  <trevnorris>cjihrig: that check is done in C++ using Value::IsUint32(), which if it's possible to have a value that is not an uint32 then the check needs to be changed.
04:09:29  <trevnorris>cjihrig: but i'm fine w/ checking non-standard types like uint32 when appropriate.
04:09:44  <trevnorris>the type and range of those values are well defined.
04:10:47  <cjihrig>trevnorris: since you just took a look at 8717, do you think it's worth trying to accommodate the −2 value for OS X, or leave it alone
04:12:40  <trevnorris>cjihrig: as he mentions, -2 is stored as 2^32 - 2. that is what will happen internally if we simply did a Value:Uint32Value() cast on the argument.
04:13:05  <trevnorris>cjihrig: so we should possibly change the check to be more loose, and coerce other values.
04:14:09  * inolenquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
04:14:41  <trevnorris>cjihrig: do you know if "nobody" is a special case for negative values?
04:15:19  <cjihrig>trevnorris: i **think** so
04:16:22  <trevnorris>hm...
04:18:06  <trevnorris>cjihrig: that's strange. on linux "nobody" is 65534. or 2^16 - 2.
04:18:24  <trevnorris>so it follows the same principle, but difference value size.
04:18:26  <trevnorris>(uint16)
04:18:30  <trevnorris>let me think about it.
04:19:01  <tjfontaine>what's going on?
04:19:21  <cjihrig>it's definitely a edge case. just wasn't sure if it was worth bothering with
04:19:27  <cjihrig>an*
04:21:24  <cjihrig>hi tjfontaine
04:21:44  <tjfontaine>hey
04:23:42  * AvianFluquit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
04:24:03  <tjfontaine>we can change timers to throw on invalid input for 0.12, but not really for 0.10
04:24:31  <tjfontaine>sadly
04:24:51  <cjihrig>i think "invalid" is the part that is in question
04:25:21  <cjihrig>numeric strings, NaN, Infinity, negative numbers, etc. everyone has different definitions of invalid
04:25:52  <tjfontaine>so there's good news here
04:26:02  <tjfontaine>it's always easier to relax constraints than it is to increase them
04:26:32  <tjfontaine>so, actually admitting there are invalid values makes it such that we can be specific about the api and say we throw
04:26:59  <tjfontaine>I think it's less obvious to rely upon coercion in this case, we either always care if it's not a string, or we never care
04:27:35  <tjfontaine>having well defined and documented APIs gives us a great opportunity to validate input consistently across the platform [which we don't *yet*] :)
04:28:02  <tjfontaine>here, I cannot reasonably think of a reason where the programmer actually *meant* to pass a string
04:28:17  <tjfontaine>this api clearly requires a number
04:28:37  <tjfontaine>(I will transcribe this commentary into the issue)
04:29:52  <cjihrig>so for 0.12, all the timers (socket.prototype.setTimeout(), setTimeout(), etc.) can be restricted to only 0 and finite positive numbers, with no type coercion?
04:30:17  <cjihrig>with a TypeError on anything else
04:30:21  <tjfontaine>yes
04:30:24  <tjfontaine>that's how I'm commenting
04:30:32  <tjfontaine>at least that's my position on this
04:31:40  <cjihrig>ok. that seems to be jgi's position too, and close to mine
04:32:04  <tjfontaine>where do you differ?
04:33:09  <cjihrig>i wanted to throw on non numbers and force the number to an unsigned
04:33:17  <cjihrig>(contrary to the original title of the PR)
04:34:07  <tjfontaine>ok, does my position on why not make sense?
04:34:56  <cjihrig>yes it makes sense. i'm fine with being more restrictive
04:35:05  <tjfontaine>coolio -- I'm finishing up my comment
04:35:51  <cjihrig>thanks
04:39:41  <tjfontaine>commented
04:40:18  <cjihrig>looks good
04:40:50  <tjfontaine>cjihrig: btw, are you available for a call tuesday morning?
04:41:15  <cjihrig>yes
04:41:26  <tjfontaine>ok, expect an invite in your inbox
04:41:47  <cjihrig>cool :-)
04:49:11  * rmgquit (Remote host closed the connection)
04:51:16  * kazuponjoined
04:53:30  * wolfeidauquit
04:56:36  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
04:58:35  * kazuponjoined
05:04:54  * cjbquit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
05:06:49  * qard_joined
05:08:36  * qardquit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
05:11:48  * Rolinhquit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
05:12:15  * Rolinhjoined
05:15:31  * kriskowaljoined
05:25:50  * avalanche123joined
05:38:04  * AvianFlujoined
05:40:52  * brsonjoined
05:44:53  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
05:49:30  * avalanche123joined
05:49:44  * rmgjoined
05:53:36  * c4milojoined
05:53:43  * ovefjoined
05:55:05  * rmgquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
05:58:03  * kriskowalquit (Quit: kriskowal)
05:58:46  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
05:58:52  * ovefpart
06:02:08  * AvianFluquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
06:04:57  * ovefjoined
06:29:44  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
06:31:04  * iarnajoined
06:37:31  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
06:41:47  * avalanch_joined
06:45:07  * avalanche123quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
06:47:51  * avalanche123joined
06:49:35  * avalanche123quit (Read error: No route to host)
06:50:16  * avalanche123joined
06:50:57  * avalanch_quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
06:52:55  * iarnajoined
06:56:51  * iarnaquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
06:57:21  * iarnajoined
06:58:41  * dshaw_joined
07:00:27  * nickleeflyquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
07:07:28  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
07:07:57  * iarnajoined
07:11:49  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
07:12:14  * iarnaquit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
07:20:38  * ryancolejoined
07:20:38  * ryancolequit (Changing host)
07:20:38  * ryancolejoined
07:35:40  * inolenjoined
07:42:41  * nickleeflyjoined
07:43:59  <saghul>creationix: could you please PR that?
07:48:28  * kazuponjoined
07:55:03  * inolenquit (Quit: Leaving.)
08:02:14  * Alex7Komjoined
08:16:11  * brsonquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
08:20:29  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
08:21:44  * brsonjoined
08:29:13  * SergeiRNDjoined
08:37:22  * a_lequit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
08:39:56  * rmg_joined
08:40:38  * ovefquit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
08:44:12  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
08:44:17  * rmg_quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
08:45:42  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
08:46:16  * inolenjoined
09:20:53  * avalanche123joined
09:25:41  * avalanche123quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
09:28:17  * andrehjrjoined
09:31:33  * c4milojoined
09:36:51  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
09:38:31  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
09:55:44  * ryancolequit (Quit: (null))
10:08:39  * iarnajoined
10:09:29  * andrehjrjoined
10:12:57  * iarnaquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
10:16:23  * bajtosjoined
10:28:33  * bajtosquit (Quit: bajtos)
10:28:40  * rmgjoined
10:33:07  * rmgquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
10:39:04  * abraxas_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
10:39:40  * abraxas_joined
10:44:04  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
10:58:58  * chris_99joined
11:02:46  * janjongboomjoined
11:02:52  * janjongboomquit (Client Quit)
11:03:24  * SergeiRNDquit (Quit: Leaving.)
11:07:03  * Left_Turnjoined
11:10:26  * nickleeflyquit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
11:20:52  * c4milojoined
11:21:10  * seishunjoined
11:25:55  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
11:38:46  * Left_Turnquit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
11:42:43  * SergeiRNDjoined
11:46:39  * janjongboomjoined
11:46:42  * AlexisMochajoined
11:50:21  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
12:02:37  * dshaw_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
12:04:51  * cjbjoined
12:16:32  * iarnajoined
12:27:47  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
12:28:11  * abraxas_joined
12:32:56  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
12:34:00  * tarrudajoined
12:34:08  * janjongboomquit (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
12:34:25  * tarrudaquit (Client Quit)
12:41:12  * Left_Turnjoined
12:43:30  * janjongboomjoined
13:07:53  * tarrudajoined
13:08:51  * tarrudaquit (Client Quit)
13:09:57  * c4milojoined
13:12:03  * tarrudajoined
13:12:24  * petka_joined
13:14:52  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
13:25:21  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
13:34:21  * andrehjrjoined
13:44:56  * janjongboomquit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
14:01:20  <MI6>joyent/node: Ben Noordhuis v0.10 * f9456a2 : crypto: update root certificates (+2 more commits) - http://git.io/i0PbYA
14:17:10  * abraxas_joined
14:22:25  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
14:30:50  * bradleymeckjoined
14:34:51  * kazuponjoined
14:37:33  * c4milojoined
14:41:59  * Fishrock123joined
14:42:34  * c4miloquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
14:53:36  * bajtosjoined
15:04:10  * iarnajoined
15:08:36  * KennethWilkejoined
15:10:27  * SergeiRNDquit (Quit: Leaving.)
15:10:36  <MI6>joyent/node: Fedor Indutny v0.10 * 8c86898 : zlib: do not Unref() if wasn't Ref()ed - http://git.io/rOWO9A
15:13:33  * tarrudaquit (Quit: WeeChat 1.0.1)
15:17:56  * reqsharkquit (Quit: Be back later ...)
15:21:45  * rmgjoined
15:26:27  * rmgquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
15:33:34  * AvianFlujoined
15:44:26  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
15:45:24  * andrehjrjoined
15:59:51  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
16:02:02  * reqsharkjoined
16:02:50  * kazuponjoined
16:03:24  * avalanche123joined
16:06:15  * abraxas_joined
16:09:43  * reqsharkquit (Quit: Be back later ...)
16:18:56  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
16:23:29  <MI6>joyent/node: Alexis Campailla v0.12 * 0674cba : test: mark current flaky tests as flaky (+1 more commits) - http://git.io/DChHbQ
16:24:03  * reqsharkjoined
16:25:42  * dshaw_joined
16:28:04  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
16:28:22  * chris_99quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
16:29:46  <cjihrig>saghul: ping
16:30:29  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
16:36:28  * lanceballchanged nick to lance|afk
16:39:44  * kazuponjoined
16:40:22  * kazuponquit (Remote host closed the connection)
16:41:09  * SergeiRNDjoined
16:43:31  * KennethWilkequit (Quit: Leaving)
16:44:09  * KennethWilkejoined
16:46:33  * avalanche123joined
16:50:53  * bajtosquit (Quit: bajtos)
16:51:16  * avalanche123quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
16:53:36  * dap_joined
17:01:53  * rmgjoined
17:04:56  * dshaw_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
17:08:01  * onur_joined
17:08:01  * onur_changed nick to ovef
17:08:09  * ovefquit (Changing host)
17:08:10  * ovefjoined
17:18:52  * chris_99joined
17:21:59  * brsonjoined
17:28:32  * ovef_joined
17:29:23  * ovefquit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
17:32:42  * ovef_quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
17:33:31  * ovefjoined
17:37:44  * brsonquit (Quit: leaving)
17:37:56  * brsonjoined
17:38:16  * bajtosjoined
17:38:44  * janjongboomjoined
17:41:05  * kazuponjoined
17:42:36  * SergeiRNDquit (Quit: Leaving.)
17:43:03  * brsonquit (Quit: leaving)
17:43:17  * brsonjoined
17:44:37  <creationix>saghul: where is the docs repo for libuv?
17:46:10  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
17:46:28  * ovefquit (Quit: leaving)
17:47:11  * ovefjoined
17:51:13  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
17:54:48  * abraxas_joined
17:58:15  * dshaw_joined
17:58:43  * brsonjoined
17:59:49  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
18:01:21  * AvianFluquit (Quit: Leaving)
18:01:59  * a_lejoined
18:02:11  * inolenquit (Quit: Leaving.)
18:02:21  <octetcloud>creationix: libuv docs were merged to main repo: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/tree/master/docs/src
18:02:32  <creationix>thanks
18:04:43  * SergeiRNDjoined
18:06:25  <creationix>saghul: PR sent. Let me know if my wording is incorrect in the docs or the commit message. https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/31
18:06:34  <creationix>octetcloud: thanks for pointing me in the right direction
18:06:54  * octetcloudquit (Quit: WeeChat 1.0.1)
18:07:04  * SergeiRNDquit (Client Quit)
18:07:13  * octetcloudjoined
18:14:15  * dshaw_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
18:15:49  * dshaw_joined
18:18:05  * avalanche123joined
18:20:16  * kriskowaljoined
18:20:34  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
18:26:52  * stagasjoined
18:27:55  * lance|afkchanged nick to lanceball
18:32:58  * bajtosquit (Quit: bajtos)
18:36:32  * bajtosjoined
18:42:25  * Alex7Komquit
18:48:49  * davijoined
18:50:53  * lanceballchanged nick to lance|afk
19:02:27  * reqshark_joined
19:05:40  * jgijoined
19:06:32  * SergeiRNDjoined
19:06:55  * reqsharkquit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
19:07:51  <jgi>cjihrig: good morning
19:09:29  * Ralithquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
19:09:31  <cjihrig>jgi: good afternoon ;-) looks like a decision has been made to be as restrictive as possible
19:09:35  <cjihrig>which i'm fine with
19:09:55  <jgi>cjihrig: cool, I wanted to check back to see if you needed more feedback
19:10:27  <jgi>cjihrig: so that you are not blocked waiting on any of us
19:10:46  <cjihrig>jgi: nah, i don't think so. chatted on here a bit with TJ last night too. if anything else comes up, i'll ping you. otherwise, i'll ping you on the issue once it's updated
19:10:59  <jgi>cjihrig: alright
19:11:08  <cjihrig>jgi: thanks :-)
19:27:54  * bajtosquit (Quit: bajtos)
19:28:37  * daviquit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
19:30:05  * reqshark_quit (Remote host closed the connection)
19:30:07  * kazuponjoined
19:30:32  * reqshark_joined
19:34:37  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
19:34:38  * AlexisMochaquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
19:40:28  * Ralithjoined
19:42:19  * octetcloudquit (Quit: WeeChat 1.0.1)
19:43:23  * octetcloudjoined
19:43:25  * AlexisMochajoined
19:44:02  * abraxas_joined
19:46:56  * SergeiRNDquit (Quit: Leaving.)
19:48:17  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
20:00:08  * avalanche123joined
20:00:23  * bradleymeckquit (Quit: bradleymeck)
20:01:37  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:02:13  * dshaw_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
20:14:03  * c4milojoined
20:14:05  * c4miloquit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:14:47  * c4milojoined
20:15:56  * c4miloquit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:16:07  * bradleymeckjoined
20:16:11  * c4milojoined
20:16:20  * c4miloquit (Remote host closed the connection)
20:16:40  * avalanche123joined
20:17:01  * c4milojoined
20:19:05  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
20:19:16  * inolenjoined
20:19:32  * lance|afkchanged nick to lanceball
20:30:54  * kazuponjoined
20:35:17  * dshaw_joined
20:35:36  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
20:35:55  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
20:57:55  * brsonjoined
21:00:14  * inolenquit (Quit: Leaving.)
21:02:30  * inolenjoined
21:03:19  * inolenquit (Client Quit)
21:06:36  * inolenjoined
21:06:37  * inolenquit (Client Quit)
21:14:01  * AlexisMochaquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
21:16:14  * chris_99quit (Remote host closed the connection)
21:18:11  * bradleymeckquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
21:19:11  * bradleymeckjoined
21:22:34  * jgiquit (Quit: jgi)
21:29:58  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
21:31:23  * andrehjrjoined
21:32:14  * avalanche123joined
21:32:40  * abraxas_joined
21:37:36  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
21:41:44  <cjihrig>jgi: this is taking longer than expected. there are a lot of tests that need fixed because they don't actually pass a timeout to setTimeout(). just wanted to give you an update
21:42:12  * brsonquit (Quit: leaving)
21:42:30  * brsonjoined
21:47:17  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
21:49:03  * c4miloquit
21:59:08  * jgijoined
22:04:21  * KennethWilkequit (Quit: Leaving)
22:10:05  * brsonjoined
22:10:58  * andrehjrquit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
22:19:59  * kazuponjoined
22:20:38  * bradleymeck_joined
22:20:38  * bradleymeck_quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
22:21:00  <trevnorris>saghul: ping
22:21:33  * bradleymeck_joined
22:21:45  * bradleymeckquit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
22:21:45  * bradleymeck_changed nick to bradleymeck
22:23:44  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
22:24:37  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
22:25:28  * dap_1joined
22:26:25  * dap_quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
22:31:59  <cjihrig>trevnorris: the libuv issue with the repl has been rolled back. want to bring in that commit?
22:32:17  <trevnorris>cjihrig: it's been rolled back in libuv?
22:32:37  <cjihrig>trevnorris: yea - https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/32
22:34:30  <trevnorris>cjihrig: yeah. either we can float the patch or just upgrade to latest libuv.
22:36:04  <cjihrig>has there been a new release?
22:37:05  <trevnorris>cjihrig: doesn't matter. we'll either float the patch or upgrade to latest if necessary.
22:40:20  <cjihrig>trevnorris: looks like 1.0.1 is the latest, which is in the 0.12 branch
22:41:15  <trevnorris>cjihrig: so that fix must have been merged after 1.0.1.
22:41:37  <cjihrig>trevnorris: yea the revert just went in today
22:42:03  <trevnorris>okay. if they aren't planning on doing a release soon then let's just land the patch.
22:42:11  * dap_1quit (Quit: Leaving.)
22:42:31  <cjihrig>ok
22:46:35  * kriskowalquit (Quit: kriskowal)
22:49:41  * Fishrock123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
22:51:27  * kriskowaljoined
22:52:04  <octetcloud>#8643 ... deathly silence on that... no-one is using dgram, much I guess, and particularly with cluster. and clearly, no-one is using dgram and cluster on windows, given that it kills node
22:52:36  * kriskowalquit (Client Quit)
22:53:44  <octetcloud>maybe someone can weigh in, or out, if they really think all client dgram sockets across all workers sharing the same socket is actually desireable
22:54:05  <cjihrig>octetcloud: i'm +1 on the change
22:54:48  * kriskowaljoined
23:01:23  <jgi>octetcloud: I’ll try to take some time to have a look, but I already have a lot on my plate today
23:01:43  * kriskowalquit (Quit: kriskowal)
23:03:17  * brsonquit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
23:05:28  * iarnajoined
23:05:54  * Fishrock123joined
23:08:45  * iarnaquit (Remote host closed the connection)
23:13:46  * dap_joined
23:18:08  * chris_99joined
23:20:46  * kazuponjoined
23:21:53  * abraxas_joined
23:22:38  * dshaw_quit (Quit: Leaving.)
23:24:07  * bradleymeckquit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
23:25:27  * kazuponquit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
23:26:24  * abraxas_quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
23:27:45  * bradleymeckjoined
23:34:09  * avalanche123quit (Remote host closed the connection)
23:35:04  <chrisdickinson>hm, running into issues building node v0.12 branch on smartos: https://gist.github.com/chrisdickinson/be2908234721832e62d7
23:39:43  * avalanche123joined
23:40:04  * brsonjoined
23:54:06  * dshaw_joined
23:57:11  * kazuponjoined
23:57:39  * seishunquit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)